<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Others on Ezzo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tulipgirl.com/index.php/2009/07/others-on-ezzo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tulipgirl.com/index.php/2009/07/others-on-ezzo/</link>
	<description>a garden of ideas on mothering, theology, and gracious living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:30:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.tulipgirl.com/index.php/2009/07/others-on-ezzo/comment-page-1/#comment-16443</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tulipgirl.com/?p=4366#comment-16443</guid>
		<description>I love Thatmom&#039;s comment!  She&#039;s right on- as usual!  Thanks for highlighting it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Thatmom&#8217;s comment!  She&#8217;s right on- as usual!  Thanks for highlighting it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savannah</title>
		<link>http://www.tulipgirl.com/index.php/2009/07/others-on-ezzo/comment-page-1/#comment-16440</link>
		<dc:creator>Savannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tulipgirl.com/?p=4366#comment-16440</guid>
		<description>I am an &quot;old&quot; mom, a mom in her mid-forties whose children are grown or nearly grown.  However, I have read quite a bit on a number of parenting philosophies lately, mostly by happenstance because of some of the blogs I visit, such as truewomanhood, thatmom, etc.  I was unfamiliar with the Ezzos, per se, but then did vaguely remember that it was a bandwagon that some of the more formulaic types from our church at that time jumped onto - this would have been the early to mid-90s.  I believed in meetings my babies&#039; needs as they were presented to me, so GKGW never had much appeal for me.

My observation would just be to be very, very suspicious of anyone who thinks they have all of the answers when it comes to parenting.  While scripture gives us much guidance, there is no man-made, foolproof formula for raising godly, healthy children.  Anything that sets itself up as judgmental and narrow is probably not of God.  I am not picking on just the Ezzo stuff here, though it certainly qualifies, but I see this on both ends of the spectrum.  Recently, in an online discussion where one of the participants was an avid Attachment Parent-er, she referred to strollers as &quot;dumb&quot;, I guess not realizing that that sounds an awful lot like &quot;using strollers is dumb&quot; or &quot;dumb people use strollers&quot; and then offered up some questionable hypothesis that strollers cause or are linked to developmental delays. :roll: 

Okay, she is entitled to decide whether or not to place her child in a stroller or not, but perhaps should also realize that many many millions of parents raised children using strollers as one device of conveyance, with no apparent harm at all, through many decades.  It&#039;s okay to do what one feels convicted to do with regard to raising one&#039;s own children, but it&#039;s not necessary to call anyone else&#039;s innocuous choices into question in order to validate one&#039;s own viewpoint.

I find this trend divisive, no matter which side of the aisle it appears on.  It makes me almost grateful that the internet was not available to me when my children were babies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an &#8220;old&#8221; mom, a mom in her mid-forties whose children are grown or nearly grown.  However, I have read quite a bit on a number of parenting philosophies lately, mostly by happenstance because of some of the blogs I visit, such as truewomanhood, thatmom, etc.  I was unfamiliar with the Ezzos, per se, but then did vaguely remember that it was a bandwagon that some of the more formulaic types from our church at that time jumped onto &#8211; this would have been the early to mid-90s.  I believed in meetings my babies&#8217; needs as they were presented to me, so GKGW never had much appeal for me.</p>
<p>My observation would just be to be very, very suspicious of anyone who thinks they have all of the answers when it comes to parenting.  While scripture gives us much guidance, there is no man-made, foolproof formula for raising godly, healthy children.  Anything that sets itself up as judgmental and narrow is probably not of God.  I am not picking on just the Ezzo stuff here, though it certainly qualifies, but I see this on both ends of the spectrum.  Recently, in an online discussion where one of the participants was an avid Attachment Parent-er, she referred to strollers as &#8220;dumb&#8221;, I guess not realizing that that sounds an awful lot like &#8220;using strollers is dumb&#8221; or &#8220;dumb people use strollers&#8221; and then offered up some questionable hypothesis that strollers cause or are linked to developmental delays. :roll: </p>
<p>Okay, she is entitled to decide whether or not to place her child in a stroller or not, but perhaps should also realize that many many millions of parents raised children using strollers as one device of conveyance, with no apparent harm at all, through many decades.  It&#8217;s okay to do what one feels convicted to do with regard to raising one&#8217;s own children, but it&#8217;s not necessary to call anyone else&#8217;s innocuous choices into question in order to validate one&#8217;s own viewpoint.</p>
<p>I find this trend divisive, no matter which side of the aisle it appears on.  It makes me almost grateful that the internet was not available to me when my children were babies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan@SortaCrunchy</title>
		<link>http://www.tulipgirl.com/index.php/2009/07/others-on-ezzo/comment-page-1/#comment-16439</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan@SortaCrunchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tulipgirl.com/?p=4366#comment-16439</guid>
		<description>Much gratitude for the links.  I never would have had the courage to say anything if it weren&#039;t for your bold inspiration.  Thanks for holding my hand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much gratitude for the links.  I never would have had the courage to say anything if it weren&#8217;t for your bold inspiration.  Thanks for holding my hand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molly</title>
		<link>http://www.tulipgirl.com/index.php/2009/07/others-on-ezzo/comment-page-1/#comment-16438</link>
		<dc:creator>molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tulipgirl.com/?p=4366#comment-16438</guid>
		<description>Super cool....   Thanks!  :smile:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super cool&#8230;.   Thanks!  :smile:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

